Skip to main content Scroll Top

CLIENT STORY · 2023–2025

FIVE FACTOR™ · TEAM ALIGNMENT / ENGAGEMENT / BOARD

SCOPE · Strategic planning, governance development, community alignment, system of care optimization

Building a Regional Response
to Homelessness

The City of Joplin engaged Sharity to support a homelessness response that matched the true regional nature of the issue. While services were concentrated within city limits, the need extended across the broader tri-state area.

Through a structured planning process grounded in community input, Sharity helped align stakeholders, clarify system gaps, and establish a governance model designed to distribute responsibility more effectively across the region.

The Outcome

The engagement helped establish a Regional Commission on Homelessness, increase government funding, and support the hiring of the coalition’s first full-time staff member, creating a more coordinated and sustainable system of care.

As a regional anchor for the tri-state area, Joplin faced a shifting landscape following the 2011 tornado. The destruction of thousands of residences severely constrained the local affordable housing inventory, leading to a rise in regional homelessness. The catastrophic EF5 storm that struck on May 22, 2011, claimed 161 lives and caused approximately $2.8 billion in destruction. Its mile-wide path demolished nearly 8,000 buildings, including the primary regional medical center, fundamentally altering the city’s infrastructure and social needs.

In the wake of the disaster, critical aid and crisis resources were anchored within a five-block radius of the city center. These emergency hubs remained fixed over the subsequent decade, leading to a centralized cluster of facilities rather than a distributed model that followed shifting regional needs. While this geographical density provided proximity for those navigating the system, it fundamentally skewed the response framework. What began as a logistical necessity evolved into a structural burden, where a broad, multi-jurisdictional challenge was increasingly perceived—and funded—as a purely local obligation.

By 2023, leaders recognized the opportunity to strengthen coordination, expand regional participation, and build a more sustainable system of care.

A Regional Issue Concentrated in One City

The core challenge was structural, not programmatic.

Service providers were working with commitment and urgency. City leaders, nonprofit partners, public agencies, and community members all had a role in the response. But the system needed a clearer way to coordinate responsibility, prioritize resources, and align around shared outcomes.

Several realities shaped the work:

The question was not whether Joplin cared about the issue. It was how to build a regional structure capable of matching the scale and complexity of the need.

Understanding the Full System

Sharity designed a planning process that reflected the full ecosystem, not just individual organizations.

Input was gathered through:

This process helped map both formal services and lived experience. It revealed important gaps in coordination, data, governance, and public understanding.

From there, the strategy was organized into four workgroups:

Together, these workgroups created a structure for turning community input into coordinated action.

Building Shared Accountability

One important constraint emerged during planning: the lead Continuum of Care structure depended heavily on volunteers who also worked in partner agencies. This created practical limitations and made independent prioritization more difficult.

To address that, the plan introduced a regional governance model with clearer roles:

Regional Commission on Homelessness
A decision-making body composed of leaders not receiving HUD funding, including business leaders, school representatives, hospital executives, law enforcement, and municipal representatives.

Homeless Coalition of Jasper and Newton Counties
The Continuum of Care body responsible for coordinating service delivery.

Independent Staffing Support
A mandate to secure dedicated staff capacity separate from partner organizations.

This structure separated funding decisions from service provision while preserving coordination across both. It created a stronger foundation for shared accountability, regional participation, and long-term system performance.

Strengthening the System of Care

With governance clarified, the work turned toward the operational pieces needed to support implementation.

Priorities included:

These operational shifts helped move the work from shared concern to shared system design.

From City Burden to Regional Response

Implementation is ongoing, but several important outcomes were achieved during the planning process:

The work helped reframe homelessness from a localized service burden into a regional system issue requiring coordinated governance, shared investment, and sustained operational capacity.

Read more about the impact here.

IMPACT SINCE IMPLEMENTATION

1

Regional Commission on Homelessness established

4

Strategic workgroups formed to drive coordinated action

1

First full-time dedicated coalition staff member hired

6+

Community input sessions including focus groups, interviews, and encampment tours

2

Counties brought into a shared governance structure

$2.8B

In tornado damage that reshaped the region's housing and homelessness landscape

The work helped reframe homelessness from a localized service burden into a regional system issue — requiring coordinated governance, shared investment, and sustained operational capacity.

What We Learned

When homelessness is managed only at the point of service delivery, responsibility concentrates where services are visible.

A regional governance structure changes the conditions of the work.  It creates space for shared accountability, clearer prioritization, and more sustainable system performance, especially when funding decisions are separated from direct service provision.

For Joplin, that shift helped move the region from proximity-based response toward coordinated regional responsibility.

What Might We Do Together?

If your organization is wrestling with outcomes that don’t reflect the work — or the why — we can help you define, measure, and communicate what really matters.